Stuart Krivis wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:02:00 -0700, Jim <skb.RemoveThis@wfv.inv> wrote:
>
>>Nod32 only performs outbound email scanning with Outlook, it doesn't
>>scan Eudora mailbox files, and as a result its inbound scan didn't
>
>>in your way. And it offers rapid, reliable protection. If you use
>>Microsoft Outlook (not Outlook Express), or you don't run email on the
>>PC you want to protect, I unequivocally recommend Nod32. There's
>>nothing better for those environments. If you use Eudora, take a pass
>>on Nod32. Eset claims it's impossible to scan Eudora mailbox files.
>>That's bull - lots of other AV products do it.
>
> I fail to see the point of scanning outgoing e-mail.
>
> As for Eudora, it seems to cause a lot of problems for a lot of
> people. They really need to scrap it and start from scratch.
Stuart,
I hear you. Scanning outgoing email is pointless, if not outright
stupid. The only thing even close to being as ridiculous of a concept
is appending a message to the same email message indicating that the
sender is clueless enough to do so.
If _I_ were a spammer, I would append every message that I sent with:
"This message has been scanned by NOD23,
and is certified as malware-free."
Note the 23 to keep the lawyers at bay.
I subscribed to Finnie's newsletter for 2 months, until I realized
that he had no clue about computer security. If you read his ramblings
about selecting an AV solution, at no time is efficacy at averting
malware mentioned. Scan outgoing email? WTF for?
Ron
>> Stay informed about: Avoid free antivirus products?