Welcome to SecurityForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh..

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
   Security Forums (Home) -> Others RSS
Next:  PC-Cillin and Windows Vulnerabilitis  
Author Message
Jerry Ennis

External


Since: Nov 15, 2004
Posts: 1



(Msg. 16) Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:27 am
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: alt>comp>anti-virus (more info?)

This message is not archived

 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Rick

External


Since: Jul 31, 2005
Posts: 7



(Msg. 17) Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:27 am
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Jerry Ennis" <jde1 RemoveThis @notat.att.net> wrote in message
news:601hp0555l4uhmv6iaht1n81u87gdbl9hd@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:19:52 -0500, "richard garneau"
> <rick RemoveThis @nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>I used EZ since the days of Innoculate IT. The new versions 7r was giving
>>me problem , and I removed it, I am now using AVAST waiting for CA to get
>>their act together
>>
> I also had problems with r7 and, so far, CA tech support has no
> workable solution. My computer was locking up when the desktop come up
> in the boot process. What problem(s) did you have?
>
>
> **********Signature**********
>
> Jerry Ennis

Sluggish, virtual memory low warning, program shutting down to preserve
memory, since EZ removed none of those problem reapeared

 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jafo

External


Since: Mar 15, 2005
Posts: 43



(Msg. 18) Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:27 am
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

As viewed from alt.comp.anti-virus, Rick wrote:

>"Jerry Ennis" wrote...
>> "richard garneau" wrote:
>>>I used EZ since the days of Innoculate IT. The new versions 7r
>>>was giving me problem , and I removed it, I am now using AVAST
>>>waiting for CA to get their act together

>> I also had problems with r7 and, so far, CA tech support has no
>> workable solution. My computer was locking up when the desktop
>> come up in the boot process. What problem(s) did you have?

>Sluggish, virtual memory low warning, program shutting down to
>preserve memory, since EZ removed none of those problem reapeared

Odd. I've even installed it on an old AMD 200mhz test box with no
problems. Better check out that computer.

--
Jafo
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jordan

External


Since: Oct 23, 2004
Posts: 8



(Msg. 19) Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 1:19 pm
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Jerry Ennis wrote:
> I also had problems with r7 and, so far, CA tech support has no
> workable solution. My computer was locking up when the desktop come up
> in the boot process.

If you have a firewall, a BHO monitor or any other real-time monitoring
program installed, try disabling and/or remove from startup *before*
installing EZ 7.

--
Jordan
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Friend

External


Since: Nov 14, 2004
Posts: 7



(Msg. 20) Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 4:18 pm
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> Sluggish, virtual memory low warning, program shutting down to preserve
> memory, since EZ removed none of those problem reapeared

There was a memory leak reported by some. Was found and fixed in 7.0.2. Neutral
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Roland Stiner

External


Since: Sep 06, 2004
Posts: 41



(Msg. 21) Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:05 pm
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> There was a memory leak reported by some. Was found and fixed in 7.0.2.
Neutral

7.0.2??? Where'd you get that???
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Roland Stiner

External


Since: Sep 06, 2004
Posts: 41



(Msg. 22) Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:12 pm
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> There was a memory leak reported by some. Was found and fixed in 7.0.2.
Neutral

Not out yet dude!

The latest versions of our products are as follows:

eTrustT EZ Armor: 2.4.4

eTrustT EZ Antivirus: 7.0.1.4

eTrustT EZ Firewall: r5.1



Tricks are for kids!

Roland
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jordan

External


Since: Oct 23, 2004
Posts: 8



(Msg. 23) Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 3:35 am
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Roland Stiner wrote:
>> There was a memory leak reported by some. Was found and fixed in
>> 7.0.2. Neutral
>
> Not out yet dude!
>
> The latest versions of our products are as follows:
>
> eTrustT EZ Antivirus: 7.0.1.4
>

7.0.2.1 is out:

ftp://ftpez.ca.com/pub/myeTrust/apps/EZAntivirus.exe
or
ftp://ftp.ca.com/pub/myeTrust/apps/EZAntivirus.exe


--
Jordan
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Rick

External


Since: Jul 31, 2005
Posts: 7



(Msg. 24) Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 3:35 am
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Jordan" <drjster.DeleteThis@myrealbox.whoiam.com> wrote in message
news:Izemd.511566$mD.269459@attbi_s02...
> Roland Stiner wrote:
>>> There was a memory leak reported by some. Was found and fixed in
>>> 7.0.2. Neutral
>>
>> Not out yet dude!
>>
>> The latest versions of our products are as follows:
>>
>> eTrustT EZ Antivirus: 7.0.1.4
>>
>
> 7.0.2.1 is out:
>
> ftp://ftpez.ca.com/pub/myeTrust/apps/EZAntivirus.exe
> or
> ftp://ftp.ca.com/pub/myeTrust/apps/EZAntivirus.exe
>
>
> --
> Jordan
>
>

And ??? is it better ??
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jafo

External


Since: Mar 15, 2005
Posts: 43



(Msg. 25) Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 4:26 am
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

As viewed from alt.comp.anti-virus, Friend wrote:

>> Sluggish, virtual memory low warning, program shutting down
>> to preserve memory, since EZ removed none of those problem
>>reapeared

>There was a memory leak reported by some. Was found and fixed
>in 7.0.2. Neutral

Damn, you *do* keep up to date, don't you? That was just released
yesterday (11/15).

--
Jafo
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jafo

External


Since: Mar 15, 2005
Posts: 43



(Msg. 26) Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 4:30 am
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

As viewed from alt.comp.anti-virus, Rick wrote:

>"Jordan" wrote...
>> Roland Stiner wrote:
>>>> There was a memory leak reported by some. Was found and fixed in
>>>> 7.0.2. Neutral

>>> Not out yet dude!
>>>
>>> The latest versions of our products are as follows:
>>>
>>> eTrustT EZ Antivirus: 7.0.1.4

>> 7.0.2.1 is out:
>>
>> ftp://ftpez.ca.com/pub/myeTrust/apps/EZAntivirus.exe
>> or
>> ftp://ftp.ca.com/pub/myeTrust/apps/EZAntivirus.exe

Roland writes, "the latest version of *our* [emphasis mine]
products..." as if he may be employed by CA. If so, he's
about a day late getting the word... Smile

>And ??? is it better ??

Time will tell.

--
Jafo
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Friend

External


Since: Nov 14, 2004
Posts: 7



(Msg. 27) Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 4:54 pm
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> Damn, you *do* keep up to date, don't you? That was just released
> yesterday (11/15).

Stick with me kid Wink
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Roland Stiner

External


Since: Sep 06, 2004
Posts: 41



(Msg. 28) Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 7:45 pm
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Rick

External


Since: Jul 31, 2005
Posts: 7



(Msg. 29) Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 8:50 pm
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Friend" <smietnik123.RemoveThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:c67bd78f.0411161654.38e5ee71@posting.google.com...
>> Damn, you *do* keep up to date, don't you? That was just released
>> yesterday (11/15).
>
> Stick with me kid Wink

New version installed 7.0.2.1 since 48 hrs. No problem to report,
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Roland Stiner

External


Since: Sep 06, 2004
Posts: 41



(Msg. 30) Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:17 pm
Post subject: Re: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, why do they do it! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

> New version installed 7.0.2.1 since 48 hrs. No problem to report,

I just installed it and am still missing 2% resources that I had with
version 6.X. I don't see a difference.

Roland
 >> Stay informed about: EZ ANTIVIRUS is slow and poor compared to prev version, wh.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
CA EZ antivirus 6.2.0.28 with Eudora 6.0 - Has anybody GOT the Email monitoring to work properly? I get a consistent error message that says: "No buffer space available (Error 10055)". The only way I could prevent this is to TURN-OFF Email monitoring. Everything works fine. DeWayne....

E Trust EZ Antivirus Autodownload Problem - Starting today (Oct 15), I have been getting "Autodownload received an invalid response" message at every autodownload attempt. No changes to system made since yesterday, when all was working fine. Anyone else having this problem? Server pro...

EZ Antivirus - I am buying a new system that has e-trust EZ antivirus installed. What I would like to know is: Would the firewall in XP be enough to run with this and if not would EZ be compatible with my Norton Firewall? Thanks Annie

e Trust EZ Antivirus - I have been using this for a couple of years & the few Viruses I have had it has removed OK. I am very careful with I/C mail & check any I suspect before opening. Like most people I am getting a large number of Swen messages & I have deleted ...

old version of PC-Cillin 2000 - Hi to everybody! I had an old version of PC-Cillin 2000, found on a CD enclosed to some magazine I bought a couple of years ago. It worked well and it was completely free. Recently (some months ago) I was forced to reinstall an older configuration of my....
   Security Forums (Home) -> Others All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 2 of 3

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]