 |
|
 |
|
Next: real-time protection versus full system scan
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Aug 18, 2004 Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 8:29 pm
Post subject: no firewall - risks Archived from groups: alt>comp>anti-virus (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 18, 2004 Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:53 pm
Post subject: Re: no firewall - risks [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
| Windows 98. It's updated, but I think they stopped making updates.
It's an old, slow computer @300MHz.
> Depends on the OS and if it is Windows, whether or not you have kept up
>to date with the patches.
|
>> Stay informed about: no firewall - risks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 01, 2004 Posts: 496
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:19 pm
Post subject: Re: no firewall - risks [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Quoth the raven Tim923:
> I run Zonealarm, but what exactly can a hacker do to a cable or DSL
> Internet user with no firewall. Can they delete and add files at
> will?
I don't know if Will cares, but yes, they can. Most likely you will be
infested with zombie trojans in short order. It is said a new,
unfirewalled XP system will live about a minute online before it is
compromised. (Well, maybe ten minutes...)
--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank. >> Stay informed about: no firewall - risks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 27, 2003 Posts: 215
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:47 pm
Post subject: Re: no firewall - risks [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Tim923 <tws0923.TakeThisOut@verizon.net> wrote in
news:cl4rf0lose9ivobqhs6kfp77f9p3me0hg5@4ax.com:
> Windows 98. It's updated, but I think they stopped making updates.
>
> It's an old, slow computer @300MHz.
>
>> Depends on the OS and if it is Windows, whether or not you have
>> kept up
>>to date with the patches.
If you have the skills to run without a FW and AV then by all means you
should do it. But if you're like most home users who don't have those
skills, then I would suggest you run with both.
Duane >> Stay informed about: no firewall - risks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 18, 2004 Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 1:55 am
Post subject: Re: no firewall - risks [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Yeah, McAfee was slowing up the computer too much, especially on a
computer that was slow to begin with. Now it's AVG.
>If you have the skills to run without a FW and AV then by all means you
>should do it. But if you're like most home users who don't have those
>skills, then I would suggest you run with both. >> Stay informed about: no firewall - risks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 22, 2004 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:44 am
Post subject: Re: no firewall - risks [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <u8vqf01p67t9nb411icq07sokk382ovpit DeleteThis @4ax.com>, Tim923 says...
> I run Zonealarm, but what exactly can a hacker do to a cable or DSL
> Internet user with no firewall. Can they delete and add files at
> will?
Well, Blaster and Lsass come to mind...
--
Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint >> Stay informed about: no firewall - risks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 26, 2004 Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 2:09 am
Post subject: Re: no firewall - risks [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:53:05 +0000, Tim923 wrote:
> Windows 98. It's updated, but I think they stopped making updates.
>
> It's an old, slow computer @300MHz.
Throw Suse or Mandrake linux on it, it'll run just GREAT. Then you can
laugh at all the virus and trojan warnings! >> Stay informed about: no firewall - risks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | rtf file risks? - i know that rtf does not support macros. and that doc files can be dequised as rtf. and to open rtf in wordpad. but what about imbeded images recent wmf volnibleity comes to mind? your opinion's? ps sorry about my spelling.
rtf file risks? - i know that rtf does not support macros. and that doc files can be dequised as rtf. and to open rtf in wordpad. but what about imbeded images recent wmf volnibleity comes to mind? your opinion's? ps sorry about my spelling.
Any Risks to Remove the On-Access Scan from the VirusScan .. - I installed the VirusScan Enterprise 7.0.0 to my computer. Everything seems working, but it made my computer painfully slow. I tried to disable the On-Access Scan but no success. On-Access Scan is designed to run all the time. Finally, I removed the....
Get a firewall - I get daily hits from script kiddies, using Backdoor/SubSeven Trojan. Luckily these hits are inbound, and are intercepted by the firewall. Just today, I had an outgoing attempt, by a loader.exe, that I hadn't completely or properly cleaned off off. Ge...
Firewall - Could somebody, please, tell me if there is a Firewall built into the Norton Anti-Virus 2004 I just bought...... Thank you for your answer....... Hans |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|