Welcome to SecurityForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Question.

 
   Security Forums (Home) -> General Discussions RSS
Next:  Recovery console does not run  
Author Message
"Jim

External


Since: Aug 04, 2003
Posts: 9



(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:15 pm
Post subject: Question.
Archived from groups: alt>comp>virus (more info?)

Hi,

I know this is a little off-topic but I just wondered if anyone could tell
me if Word (the Microsoft word processing program) is any longer a generally
used program. I notice that most new computers come with Works now instead.
Is Works better, do you think, or is it still best to get Word?

Cheers

Jim

 >> Stay informed about: Question. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Stephen Larivee

External


Since: Dec 05, 2004
Posts: 12



(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Question. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

I agree with Beauregard. Word (and Office) are still the standard in the
work force. The Office products are more expensive, certainly, but well
worth it, IMHO. But if you are doing work at home and do not need
PowerPoint, Excel, Outlook, etc., Works might be the way to go. Works
actually uses Word as its word processor!!!




"Jim (Guitar Centre Records)" <Jim.RemoveThis@gcvinylrecords.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cp1m0m$q8q$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> Hi,
>
> I know this is a little off-topic but I just wondered if anyone could tell
> me if Word (the Microsoft word processing program) is any longer a
> generally
> used program. I notice that most new computers come with Works now
> instead.
> Is Works better, do you think, or is it still best to get Word?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jim
>
>
>

 >> Stay informed about: Question. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Beauregard T. Shagnasty

External


Since: Aug 01, 2004
Posts: 496



(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 2:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Question. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Stephen Larivee wrote:

> I agree with Beauregard. Word (and Office) are still the standard
> in the work force. The Office products are more expensive,
> certainly, but well worth it, IMHO. But if you are doing work at
> home and do not need PowerPoint, Excel, Outlook, etc., Works might
> be the way to go. Works actually uses Word as its word
> processor!!!

Works uses Word? Granted, I haven't looked at Works for a few years,
but last time I did, it seemed more like WordPad With Enhancements
than Word. Have they added stuff to it?

--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank.
 >> Stay informed about: Question. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Dave Budd

External


Since: Apr 23, 2004
Posts: 156



(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 2:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Question. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <cp1m0m$q8q$1@sparta.btinternet.com>, "Jim \(Guitar Centre
Records\)" <Jim DeleteThis @gcvinylrecords.co.uk> says...
> Hi,
>
> I know this is a little off-topic but I just wondered if anyone could tell
> me if Word (the Microsoft word processing program) is any longer a generally
> used program. I notice that most new computers come with Works now instead.
> Is Works better, do you think, or is it still best to get Word?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
"most" new computers only come with Works in the private user category.
We buy them in hundreds with no office software and have a site licence
for Office, so we use Word - mainly.
We still have a lot of users who are happy with WordPerfect, and we do
push StarOffice at students as our licence doesn't let them take Word
home (unless they pay an arm and a leg for a licence of their own).
OpenOffice on Linux would be better still, for varying values of
"better", depending on the situation.
I haven't had to clean up a Word virus for a while now, but they're
still around, with new ones still appearing now and then.
--
Post presented in its original aspect ratio of 1.78:1 - scrollbars at
the sides of the screen are normal in this format. This high-definition
digital message was created on a run-of-the-mill PC from the restored
35mm negative. To further enhance it, many grammar and spelling errors
and other inaccuracies have been removed using the DB EBD-TC system.
 >> Stay informed about: Question. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Dave Budd

External


Since: Apr 23, 2004
Posts: 156



(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 2:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Question. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <dpZsd.523266$D%.496830@attbi_s51>,
NOlariveeslSPAM RemoveThis @yahoo.PLEASEcom says...
> I agree with Beauregard. Word (and Office) are still the standard in the
> work force. The Office products are more expensive, certainly, but well
> worth it, IMHO. But if you are doing work at home and do not need
> PowerPoint, Excel, Outlook, etc., Works might be the way to go. Works
> actually uses Word as its word processor!!!

NOBODY _needs_ PowerPoint!
--
Post presented in its original aspect ratio of 1.78:1 - scrollbars at
the sides of the screen are normal in this format. This high-definition
digital message was created on a run-of-the-mill PC from the restored
35mm negative. To further enhance it, many grammar and spelling errors
and other inaccuracies have been removed using the DB EBD-TC system.
 >> Stay informed about: Question. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Stephen Larivee

External


Since: Dec 05, 2004
Posts: 12



(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 2:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Question. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

The latest versions of Works actually use Word as the word processor. The
files work seamlessly with the Office Word.

I liked this approach. It allows people to get a low cost Office package
(Works) but use the most popular of the Office programs (Word).


"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous.TakeThisOut@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:VDZsd.39518$Uf.35051@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> Stephen Larivee wrote:
>
>> I agree with Beauregard. Word (and Office) are still the standard
>> in the work force. The Office products are more expensive,
>> certainly, but well worth it, IMHO. But if you are doing work at
>> home and do not need PowerPoint, Excel, Outlook, etc., Works might
>> be the way to go. Works actually uses Word as its word
>> processor!!!
>
> Works uses Word? Granted, I haven't looked at Works for a few years, but
> last time I did, it seemed more like WordPad With Enhancements than Word.
> Have they added stuff to it?
>
> --
> -bts
> -This space intentionally left blank.
 >> Stay informed about: Question. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Beauregard T. Shagnasty

External


Since: Aug 01, 2004
Posts: 496



(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Question. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Dave Budd wrote:

> OpenOffice on Linux would be better still, for varying values of
> "better", depending on the situation.

OpenOffice on Windows could fit there as well. All you need is time
for a 46MB download. <g> While I own MS Office 97 Pro, I'm getting to
like OOo more and more.

--
-bts
-And the price is right.
 >> Stay informed about: Question. 
Back to top
Login to vote
"Jim

External


Since: Aug 04, 2003
Posts: 9



(Msg. 8) Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2004 5:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Question. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Thanks all!
Jim

"Jim (Guitar Centre Records)" <Jim DeleteThis @gcvinylrecords.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cp1m0m$q8q$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> Hi,
>
> I know this is a little off-topic but I just wondered if anyone could tell
> me if Word (the Microsoft word processing program) is any longer a
generally
> used program. I notice that most new computers come with Works now
instead.
> Is Works better, do you think, or is it still best to get Word?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jim
>
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Question. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Question? - Hi there. If you compare NAV 2004 to Kaspersky. What gives you the best protection? Steen. P.S. I use NAV but im not pleased with it.

Question - Hi all, I lurk here but read everything. Anyway, I have a question. I have done many virus scans and my computer doesn't have any of the virus problems that are going around. Although I too am getting a ton of the fake Microsoft etc emails, I have set my...

Virus question - I was using Outlook Web Access into the firm's Exchange server across the net and I got an e-mail from a colleague (who I don't think I know) saying that an e-mail from me - apparently sent by me this afternoon - had the W32.Sobig.E@mm virus infected..

Port Question - In the past some of the regulars here have told me and others how to detect which ports on PC are open. Netstat something, I believe but I can't remember. Also, I used those commands back when I was on Windows 98. How would I use them on Windows 2000?...

A question about swen - Along with all the M$ update emails, I'm also getting a slew of 'undeliverable' emails that all have the swen attachment. These all seem to be in the same general format, just saying the original message was undeliverable, and including the attachment. I...
   Security Forums (Home) -> General Discussions All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]