Welcome to SecurityForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?

 
Goto page 1, 2
   Security Forums (Home) -> Symantec/Norton RSS
Next:  Dial Up Updates for McAfee  
Author Message
Mason C

External


Since: Jul 01, 2008
Posts: 1



(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:37 pm
Post subject: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad?
Archived from groups: alt>comp>anti-virus (more info?)

My Noton anti-virus is about to expire.
(By accident I got it free a year ago.)

Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why.

Mason C running private PC politely

 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ernie B.

External


Since: Jun 18, 2008
Posts: 5



(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

This message is not archived

 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Big_Al

External


Since: Jun 16, 2008
Posts: 3



(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:12 am
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Mason C wrote:
> My Noton anti-virus is about to expire.
> (By accident I got it free a year ago.)
>
> Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why.
>
> Mason C running private PC politely

Norton and McAfee had their heyday years ago. But seems lately the two
of them cause more issues than the solve. Or at least you read about
it. I got a next to free copy one year and just about choked the
computer. You seem to have no issue now, and if you are not getting a
new version of software, just extending the license, it may still
continue to work just as well. If you've had no viruses, then maybe its
doing its job, that or you practice safe surfing.

Some of the complaints may also be the combination of applications. So
its hard to say. I run AVG8.0 and like it, but others have complained.
So you see, there's no accounting for problems. Its a gamble. Yes,
you can take an educated guess, but that's about all it is.
 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Quilljar

External


Since: May 01, 2008
Posts: 10



(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

The first thing I do for my computer clients is to uninstall the bloated and
expensive Norton AV which tries to take over your computer. I then replace
it with AVG free which is easy to use and costs nothing and is better than
Norton in several ways. I should add, that I have had no trouble with the
latest AVG v8 free version as one or two people seem to have had.

--
Yours Quilly,
http://quilljar.users.btopenworld.com/
"Mason C" <masoncXXX RemoveThis @XXXfrontal-lobe.info> wrote in message
news:gkml6494a78h5ke1vfv8ub3743ijs772sb@4ax.com...
> My Noton anti-virus is about to expire.
> (By accident I got it free a year ago.)
>
> Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why.
>
> Mason C running private PC politely
 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Little Charlie

External


Since: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: 2



(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
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 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Beauregard T. Shagnasty

External


Since: Aug 01, 2004
Posts: 493



(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Bud wrote:

> All that stuff found it's way on to my machine while on Norton's
> watch.

Well, there's a great testimonial! <lol>

> I'm running, all at the same time:
> AntiVir, AVG free 8,

Hopefully, you aren't running two *resident* apps at the same time. They
will surely conflict with each other (same as two firewalls). It's ok to
keep several on hand for *on-demand* scanning, but not full-time
running.

> Spybot S&D, Super Antispyware, and they all get along so far and
> unlike others, I've had no speed problem from any of them.

...so long as they aren't running at the same time, there should be no
problems.

An alternative to needing all those tools is to switch to an impervious
operating system. <g>

--
-bts
-Friends don't let friends drive Windows
 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
ASCII

External


Since: Jul 02, 2008
Posts: 6



(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Kayman

External


Since: Feb 04, 2008
Posts: 29



(Msg. 8) Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:37:11 -0700, Mason C wrote:

> My Noton anti-virus is about to expire.

Good!

> Should I renew?

No!

> I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why.

Right, read other posts.

Then download and run the Norton Removal Tool
http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/tsgeninfo.nsf/docid/2005033108162039

Choose one (1):
Avira AntiVir® Personal - FREE Antivirus
http://www.free-av.com/
You may wish to consider removing the 'AntiVir Nagscreen'
http://www.elitekiller.com/files/disable_antivir_nag.htm
or
Free antivirus - avast! 4 Home Edition
It includes ANTI-SPYWARE protection, certified by the West Coast Labs
Checkmark process, and ANTI-ROOTKIT DETECTION based on the best-in class
GMER technology.
http://www.avast.com/eng/avast_4_home.html
(Choose Custom Installation and under Resident
Protection, uncheck: Internet Mail and Outlook/Exchange.)
or
AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition
http://free.grisoft.com/
(Choose custom install and untick the email scanner plugin.)
or
ESET NOD32 Antivirus - Not Free
http://www.eset.com/
or
Kaspersky® Anti-Virus 7.0 - Not Free
http://www.kaspersky.com/homeuser

FYI
Why You Don't Need Your Anti-Virus Program to Scan Your E-Mail
http://thundercloud.net/infoave/tutorials/email-scanning/index.htm
 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bud

External


Since: Jul 03, 2008
Posts: 1



(Msg. 9) Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 12:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:01:22 -0500, sherwindu <sherwindu RemoveThis @comcast.net>
wrote:
> Really surprising that there are no conflicts between different anti-virus
> programs. That has not been my experience. Also, AVG free 8 runs
> ok on my Vista quad machine with 2 gig, but bogs down my Athlon
> 1.3 Gig machine with 500 meg. AVG 7.5 seemed to be less resource
> demanding, and certainly more user friendly.

From what I've been reading here, my machine should be crawling, but
it's not. When I installed all those I figured that I'd run them for a
while and see how it went and then turn off the ones that appeared to
be slowing me down, I haven't had to do that yet.
AMD 2700+, 1GB RAM, 1TB hard drives, XP Pro
I noticed that Norton is offering AV for Linux, is that really
necessary?
 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
David H. Lipman

External


Since: Jul 04, 2003
Posts: 1727



(Msg. 10) Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 3:41 pm
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

From: "Bud" <k7kkg.DeleteThis@yahoo.com>

| On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:01:22 -0500, sherwindu <sherwindu.DeleteThis@comcast.net>
| wrote:
>> Really surprising that there are no conflicts between different anti-virus
>> programs. That has not been my experience. Also, AVG free 8 runs
>> ok on my Vista quad machine with 2 gig, but bogs down my Athlon
>> 1.3 Gig machine with 500 meg. AVG 7.5 seemed to be less resource
>> demanding, and certainly more user friendly.

| From what I've been reading here, my machine should be crawling, but
| it's not. When I installed all those I figured that I'd run them for a
| while and see how it went and then turn off the ones that appeared to
| be slowing me down, I haven't had to do that yet.
| AMD 2700+, 1GB RAM, 1TB hard drives, XP Pro
| I noticed that Norton is offering AV for Linux, is that really
| necessary?

Installing an AV solution is prudent. Using Norton's solution is not.

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
David W. Hodgins

External


Since: Mar 04, 2006
Posts: 50



(Msg. 11) Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:40:39 -0400, Bud <k7kkg.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I noticed that Norton is offering AV for Linux, is that really
> necessary?

Only if the linux system is being used to process email, or other files
destined for an m$ system.

Regards, Dave Hodgins

--
Change nomail.afraid.org to ody.ca to reply by email.
(nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for
use in usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)
 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
louise

External


Since: Aug 29, 2006
Posts: 60



(Msg. 12) Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:34 am
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Mason C wrote:
> My Noton anti-virus is about to expire.
> (By accident I got it free a year ago.)
>
> Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why.
>
> Mason C running private PC politely


Norton is a terrible resource hog and little by little, I've
uninstalled everything Norton from my machine.

I've been extremely happy with ESET NOD - I'm just using the
AV (not the new suite). This is my third year with it, my
daughter uses it also, and both of us are very pleased. It
is quite low on resource usage, updated definitions
frequently and without a lot of fanfare - it just works and
works well.

It has also "caught" a couple of things over the years when
I've gone to some "iffy" websites. You do have to pay for
it, but think of the "cost" of getting your system infected
and/or having its resources overused on a daily basis.

Louise
 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Dustin Cook

External


Since: Jun 01, 2006
Posts: 152



(Msg. 13) Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Mason C <masoncXXX.RemoveThis@XXXfrontal-lobe.info> wrote in
news:gkml6494a78h5ke1vfv8ub3743ijs772sb@4ax.com:

> My Noton anti-virus is about to expire.
> (By accident I got it free a year ago.)
>
> Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why.
>
> Mason C running private PC politely
>

Sorry for coming into this so late, but I would allow Norton to go ahead
and expire and replace it with another program. If you prefer another paid
for application, go with Nod32 and MBAM (malwarebytes antimalware)


--
Regards,
Dustin Cook - http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
BugHunter v2.2e AntiMalware Removal Utility
For Windows users, I highly recommend:
http://www.malwarebytes.org - MalwareBytes AntiMalware
 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
louise

External


Since: Aug 29, 2006
Posts: 60



(Msg. 14) Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:55 am
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Dustin Cook wrote:
> Mason C <masoncXXX DeleteThis @XXXfrontal-lobe.info> wrote in
> news:gkml6494a78h5ke1vfv8ub3743ijs772sb@4ax.com:
>
>> My Noton anti-virus is about to expire.
>> (By accident I got it free a year ago.)
>>
>> Should I renew? I sense dislike for Norton here but don't know why.
>>
>> Mason C running private PC politely
>>
>
> Sorry for coming into this so late, but I would allow Norton to go ahead
> and expire and replace it with another program. If you prefer another paid
> for application, go with Nod32 and MBAM (malwarebytes antimalware)
>
>
I'm using Webroot and it is using much too much of my
resources. I really feel the machine slow down.

I'm also using NOD and I love it.

How is Malwarebites on resources?

Thanks

Louise
 >> Stay informed about: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? 
Back to top
Login to vote
FredW

External


Since: May 23, 2008
Posts: 7



(Msg. 15) Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:10 am
Post subject: Re: Symantec Norton Anti-Virus -- good? bad? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Symantec/Norton command-line anti-virus scanner? - Which supported Symantec/Norton product(s) provides command-line access for anti-virus scanning, preferably on Win XP? I have read, unofficially, that it can be done with Norton Corporate Edition 10.x but that its results are frequently inaccurate. ...

Please help with Symantec Anti-Virus - I just installed an upgrade for my Small Business Edition to 8.0, server with 5 licenses. During the installation on the server, which went smoothly, I was required to change my password from the old 5-character password to one with at least 6..

Alternatives to Symantec Anti-Virus 9.0? - Hello! I am currently using Symantec Anti-Virus 9.0 for my antivirus solution. I believe it is better than the bloated Norton Anti-Virus software by the same company. I am curious if there is even slimmer alternatives available out there for an..

Symantec Anti-Virus Renewal - I just renewed my Symantec antivirus software. The original subscription was up in July so I thought I would renew early just in case I forgot. However, the confirmation of my purchase indicated that my "renewal date" was June 5th and that I ...

Symantec Anti Virus Corporate version 8.1.825 - Is this Symantec version a good choice for a home computer? Is it protecting better or worse than the home version? I've seen several posts where people say it is far better than the home stuff. Why is it better? Is mail (Outlook Express) being scanned a...
   Security Forums (Home) -> Symantec/Norton All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page 1, 2
Page 1 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]