PC-Cillin 2003/4 vs NOD 32

In article <gmv4qv02j1v8j87all9t6b5tbp1mcrm7ip DeleteThis @4ax.com>, null DeleteThis @zilch.com
says...

> >I don't know if your newsfeed got the earlier post, but it's been determined
> >that ignorance is not his problem. He's shilling for Trend.
>
> And how does that differ from the nymshits shilling NOD32 here all the
> time?

Care to name those shills? Accusations without facts are rather
despicable.

As for myself, I'm just a happy user, but (and before you ask) I don't
*rely* on it, nor any other AV software.

You really should do something about all those bees buzzing around in
your bonnet.....

Cheers,

Roy

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:18:52 +0100, "kowts" <kowts RemoveThis @freesurf.fr> wrote:

>I tested the both and I advise you to run Pc-Cillin
>NOD 32 have a lot of detection problem and their signature are release a
>long time after Pc-Cillin

You just cost yourself a customer, fool. I'd never use your product
now that you shilled for it on Usenet.

Moron.


--
Richard Steven Hack
"Whatever does not kill me makes me stronger" -
and YOU have not killed me!