Welcome to SecurityForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

F-Prot & NOD32 Smallest FootPrint?

  
   Security Forums (Home) -> F-PROT RSS
Related Topics:
Run F-PROT for DOS from CD? - Can I run F-PROT for DOS from a CD? ISTR that F-PROT for DOS filled 2 diskettes and probably now needs 3 So I would prefer to burn a CD and run it from there. Does anyone know if this works?

F-Prot for Dos on XP - Hi, please forgive a possibly stupid Question. Before switching to WinXP I just got used to F-Prot for Dos. I think it's usefull to scan now and then before starting the OS. Now with WinXP I do miss this Win 98 just for F-Prot..

F-Prot FP-DEF.ZIP now too big for 1.44M - F-Pror now too big for 1.44M I've been waiting for this to happen and wondering how F-Prot would deal with it (e.g. split SIGN.DEF into and SIGN2.DEF into which has been my They haven't acted yet, and..

Where is F-Prot 3.14c? - Where can I get F-Prot for DOS version 3.14c? The current version 3.14e has a problem that won't allow a scan to as has been discussed here. I've been watching the F-Prot site to see if they will issue a fixed version, but none has..

F-PROT for DOS - how to run it on W2K and WXP? - It's easy in my Win98SE because I can reboot to DOS. I believe W2K has that ability, too? If so, then I can recommend it to W2K users. But what about XP? How does one get F-PROT for DOS to work in that OS? Thank you!
Next:  f-prot for dos not scanning program files dir  
Author Message
Zeitgeist

External


Since: Nov 02, 2004
Posts: 3



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:56 am
Post subject: F-Prot & NOD32 Smallest FootPrint?
Archived from groups: alt>comp>anti-virus (more info?)
I hear both of these are some of the best... Are they the ones with the
smallest memory footprint or are they smaller ones available?

 >> Stay informed about: F-Prot & NOD32 Smallest FootPrint? 
Back to top
Login to vote
optikl

External


Since: Jun 12, 2004
Posts: 335



(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:00 pm
Post subject: Re: F-Prot & NOD32 Smallest FootPrint? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Zeitgeist wrote:
> I hear both of these are some of the best... Are they the ones with the
> smallest memory footprint or are they smaller ones available?

I don't know if NOD32 has one of the smallest VM footprints, any longer.
There have been a number of features added over the past couple of years
and nothing is free. On this system, the user interface typically takes
1 MB and the kernel, which runs as a service, uses 10 MB. That really
isn't bad, compared to other programs I've looked at. I have not noticed
any memory leaks with NOD, which is a good thing.

 >> Stay informed about: F-Prot & NOD32 Smallest FootPrint? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Security Forums (Home) -> F-PROT All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
 You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]