Welcome to SecurityForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

f-prot and Mydoom ?

 
   Security Forums (Home) -> F-PROT RSS
Next:  F-Prot /removeall switch  
Author Message
Voodoo Geyer

External


Since: Jan 28, 2004
Posts: 2



(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 12:54 pm
Post subject: f-prot and Mydoom ?
Archived from groups: alt>comp>virus (more info?)

Hi Guys,

since which vdf file does f-prot dedect the mydoom virus.

Thanks a lot
--
mfg Voodoo

 >> Stay informed about: f-prot and Mydoom ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Dave"OldBloke"Budd

External


Since: Feb 03, 2004
Posts: 27



(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 12:54 pm
Post subject: Re: f-prot and Mydoom ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <bv87s9$kte$04$1@news.t-online.com>, viri-dasm.DeleteThis@gmx.net
says...
> Hi Guys,
>
> since which vdf file does f-prot dedect the mydoom virus.
>
> Thanks a lot
> --
> mfg Voodoo
>
well, since MyDoom appeared on sunday, it'll be the one after that
--
First they came for the verbs, and I said nothing,
because verbing weirds language.
Next they arrival for the nouns, and I speech
nothing because I no verbs.

 >> Stay informed about: f-prot and Mydoom ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Clay

External


Since: Mar 07, 2004
Posts: 53



(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 12:54 pm
Post subject: Re: f-prot and Mydoom ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:09:09 -0500, Jeffrey A. Setaro
<jasetaro.TakeThisOut@SPAM.ME.NOT.mags.net> wrote:

>In article <sejf10dtb8pm3771rb1i7oqn7shvc1of7d.TakeThisOut@4ax.com>,
>one.step.closer@intentionally.invalid says...
>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:51:52 -0500, Jeffrey A. Setaro
>> <jasetaro.TakeThisOut@SPAM.ME.NOT.mags.net> wrote:
>>
>> >F-Secure now uses the Kaspersky engine along with their own Orion and
>> >Libra engines.
>>
>> Is it my imagination or did I read that IE5 (or newer) is a *system
>> requirement* for F-Secure Anti-Virus 2004?
>>
>
>You did. You'd have to F-Secure why... If I had to make a WAG I'd say
>it's because of the XML based UI.

I still think it's kind of pathetic that any respectable AV software
would require the presence of such notorious, often exploited
soggyware in order to function.

Seems to me like they could/should write their own self-contained UI
and eliminate the dependency.

IMO, AV companies should at very least pretend that they seriously
recommend and promote safe computing practices...

--
Clay mania dot com
 >> Stay informed about: f-prot and Mydoom ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Voodoo Geyer

External


Since: Jan 28, 2004
Posts: 2



(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 1:01 pm
Post subject: Re: f-prot and Mydoom ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

DaveOldBlokeBudd wrote:

> In article <bv87s9$kte$04$1@news.t-online.com>, viri-dasm.DeleteThis@gmx.net
> says...
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> since which vdf file does f-prot dedect the mydoom virus.
>>
>> Thanks a lot
>> --
>> mfg Voodoo
>>
> well, since MyDoom appeared on sunday, it'll be the one after that

ok thanks

--
mfg Voodoo
 >> Stay informed about: f-prot and Mydoom ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Frederic Bonroy

External


Since: Jun 17, 2004
Posts: 247



(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:57 pm
Post subject: Re: f-prot and Mydoom ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Jeffrey A. Setaro a écrit :

> You did. You'd have to F-Secure why... If I had to make a WAG I'd say
> it's because of the XML based UI.

This is so immensely infuriating, I am speechless. Who would have
thought that they would stoop to the same level as Symantec and McAfee?

It seems that we can't escape the bloat. It's everywhere. Sad
 >> Stay informed about: f-prot and Mydoom ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
kurt wismer

External


Since: Jul 04, 2003
Posts: 1562



(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:06 pm
Post subject: Re: f-prot and Mydoom ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Jeffrey A. Setaro wrote:
[snip]
> F-Secure no longer uses the F-Prot engine BTW.

really???

i wonder why that is... how odd...

--
"hungry people don't stay hungry for long
they get hope from fire and smoke as the weak grow strong
hungry people don't stay hungry for long
they get hope from fire and smoke as they reach for the dawn"
 >> Stay informed about: f-prot and Mydoom ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
imbsysop

External


Since: Jun 25, 2004
Posts: 26



(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: f-prot and Mydoom ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:57:30 +0100, Frederic Bonroy
<bidonavirus DeleteThis @yahoo.fr> wrote:

>Jeffrey A. Setaro a écrit :
>
>> You did. You'd have to F-Secure why... If I had to make a WAG I'd say
>> it's because of the XML based UI.
>
>This is so immensely infuriating, I am speechless. Who would have
>thought that they would stoop to the same level as Symantec and McAfee?
>
>It seems that we can't escape the bloat. It's everywhere. Sad

since when did you have the impression that companies belong to the
salvation army ? .. wake up !
 >> Stay informed about: f-prot and Mydoom ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Run F-PROT for DOS from CD? - Can I run F-PROT for DOS from a CD? ISTR that F-PROT for DOS filled 2 diskettes and probably now needs 3 diskettes. So I would prefer to burn a CD and run it from there. Does anyone know if this works?

F-Prot for Dos on XP - Hi, please forgive a possibly stupid Question. Before switching to WinXP I just got used to F-Prot for Dos. I think it's usefull to scan now and then before starting the OS. Now with WinXP I do miss this opportunity. Installing Win 98 just for F-Prot....

F-Prot for DOS - what are sign2.def and fssign2.def differ.. - Any F-Prot users out there who might be able to clear up some confusion for me about the files sign2.def and fssign2.def? I noticed some time ago that the file sign2.def no longer seemed to be updated on the fsecure site that I use for regular definitio...

F-PROT for DOS and WINXP - I understand WINXP only has a SIMULATED DOS mode. I do not run WINXP so I am asking for a friend who does use XP. Can F_PROT for DOS virus scanner be used on a PC running WINXP? Is F_PROT FOR DOS effective running from WINXP SIMULATED DOS mode? I find i...

NTFS, F-Prot like scanner - Is there a virsus scanner that anyone knows of that scans a NTFS volume before Windows loads?
   Security Forums (Home) -> F-PROT All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]