Welcome to SecurityForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus

 
   Security Forums (Home) -> General Discussions RSS
Next:  HumorControl.org 20080121  
Author Message
Jean

External


Since: Jan 16, 2008
Posts: 10



(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:33 pm
Post subject: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus
Archived from groups: alt>comp>anti-virus (more info?)

My AV application: Kaspersky Anti-Virus (6.0.2.6210)

According to http://www.oehelp.com/OETips.aspx#3 e-mail scanning does not
provide any additional protection.

Would it be safe/advisable to disable the Mail Anti-Virus function?

 >> Stay informed about: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus 
Back to top
Login to vote
Beauregard T. Shagnasty

External


Since: Aug 01, 2004
Posts: 495



(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Jean wrote:

> My AV application: Kaspersky Anti-Virus (6.0.2.6210)
>
> According to http://www.oehelp.com/OETips.aspx#3 e-mail scanning does
> not provide any additional protection.

There is an important piece of info on that page:

"Because of the fragility of the OE message store structure and its
propensity for destruction, ..."

Have you considered a more robust email client? I'd recommend
Thunderbird as the most common alternative product.
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird/

> Would it be safe/advisable to disable the Mail Anti-Virus function?

Yes. As long as the anti-virus application is running in the background,
it will prevent you from executing any known viruses.
http://k75s.home.att.net/tips-sub.html

--
-bts
-Friends don't let friends drive Vista

 >> Stay informed about: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jean

External


Since: Jan 16, 2008
Posts: 10



(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:08 am
Post subject: Re: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous.TakeThisOut@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:Bsojj.139630$MJ6.28249@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Jean wrote:
>
>> My AV application: Kaspersky Anti-Virus (6.0.2.6210)
>>
>> According to http://www.oehelp.com/OETips.aspx#3 e-mail scanning does
>> not provide any additional protection.
>
> There is an important piece of info on that page:
>
> "Because of the fragility of the OE message store structure and its
> propensity for destruction, ..."
>
> Have you considered a more robust email client? I'd recommend
> Thunderbird as the most common alternative product.
> http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird/

Yes I heard about the 'fragility' of OE6 and am using now Windows Live Mail
(Version 2008), downloaded from
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=ba346005-45f6...14-a7dc

I like it because it lets me accessing multiple e-mail accounts in one place
and hope that this application is and improvement concerning 'fragility'.

>> Would it be safe/advisable to disable the Mail Anti-Virus function?
>
> Yes. As long as the anti-virus application is running in the background,
> it will prevent you from executing any > known viruses.

Thanks, I am going to disable this function right now.
 >> Stay informed about: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus 
Back to top
Login to vote
Beauregard T. Shagnasty

External


Since: Aug 01, 2004
Posts: 495



(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:08 am
Post subject: Re: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Jean wrote:

> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>> Have you considered a more robust email client? I'd recommend
>> Thunderbird as the most common alternative product.
>> http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird/
>
> Yes I heard about the 'fragility' of OE6 and am using now Windows Live
> Mail (Version 2008), downloaded from
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=ba346005-45f6...14-a7dc
>
> I like it because it lets me accessing multiple e-mail accounts in one
> place

OE can do that. <g> So does Thunderbird.

> and hope that this application is and improvement concerning
> 'fragility'.

Thunderbird does it better.

>>> Would it be safe/advisable to disable the Mail Anti-Virus function?
>>
>> Yes. As long as the anti-virus application is running in the
>> background, it will prevent you from executing any known viruses.
>
> Thanks, I am going to disable this function right now.

Good deal.

--
-bts
-Friends don't let friends drive Vista
 >> Stay informed about: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus 
Back to top
Login to vote
louise

External


Since: Aug 29, 2006
Posts: 60



(Msg. 5) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Jean wrote:
>
>> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" wrote:
>>> Have you considered a more robust email client? I'd recommend
>>> Thunderbird as the most common alternative product.
>>> http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird/
>> Yes I heard about the 'fragility' of OE6 and am using now Windows Live
>> Mail (Version 2008), downloaded from
>> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=ba346005-45f6...14-a7dc
>>
>> I like it because it lets me accessing multiple e-mail accounts in one
>> place
>
> OE can do that. <g> So does Thunderbird.
>
>> and hope that this application is and improvement concerning
>> 'fragility'.
>
> Thunderbird does it better.
>
>>>> Would it be safe/advisable to disable the Mail Anti-Virus function?
>>> Yes. As long as the anti-virus application is running in the
>>> background, it will prevent you from executing any known viruses.
>> Thanks, I am going to disable this function right now.
>
> Good deal.
>

How is this fragility in Outlook? I use Outlook as a PIM
and I'm really quite dependent upon it - and I love those
functions.

I do use Thunderbird for some other email accounts I have -
but my main one remains in Outlook.

Presently using Outlook 2003 - is there anything that should
be done to Outlook to help matters along? I do use NOD32
with the email option enabled, I use a good spam filter and
I'm careful. I know that none of this is anywhere near a
guarantee.

Louise
 >> Stay informed about: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ant

External


Since: Jan 31, 2004
Posts: 241



(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"louise" wrote:

> How is this fragility in Outlook? I use Outlook as a PIM
> and I'm really quite dependent upon it - and I love those
> functions.

Outlook Express (OE), not Outlook. They are different applications.
I've not had a problem with OE's message store but then I don't
allow anything to mess with the incoming message stream.
 >> Stay informed about: Mail Anti-Virus,alt.comp.virus 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
alt.comp.anti-virus - Hi Ian, I have looked for *.*class but "VerifierBug.class" didn't go out. bye Jones

alt.books.technical,alt.comp.anti-virus,rec.music.phish,re.. - alt.books.technical,alt.comp.anti-virus,rec.music.phish,rec.sport.boxing,rec.travel.europe

Why (some) anti-virus companies are to blame for the recen.. - As everyone knows, Sobig.F has generated a tremendous amount of e-mail traffic world-wide. However, that traffic is partly to blame on some of the anti-virus companies. What I am referring to is the large number of incorrectly configured mail filters...

Avast Anti-virus Program CAn it Scan Web-based e-mail Prog.. - I recently downloaded AVAST 4.1.357 a free anti-virus program which seems very good but I have the following questions:. 1)Is this program capable of scanning web-based e-mail such as Yahoo and others? If so how might that be done? 2)....

Doesl anti-virus program using LSP still monitor e-mail on.. - When I used Norton AntiVirus (NAV), it ran as a transparent proxy (ccApp.exe) to monitor e-mail traffic. However, it was fixed as to which ports it would monitor; i.e., it monitored the standard ports (110 for POP3 and 25 for SMTP). If I switch to..
   Security Forums (Home) -> General Discussions All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]