"malcolm bevidge" <malc.bev12 DeleteThis @honeynet.com> wrote in
news:c44j9b$2e4d5c$1@ID-80227.news.uni-berlin.de:
> Currently I'm using NAV 2004, but a few contact have told me that
> Kaspersky Anti Virus is a better overall product.
>
> Being a newbie in this field I wonder if there are any experts here
> who can advise me if it's worth switching over to Kaspersky (or do you
> know an even better product?)?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
I used to use Nortons. Used to. Now I use Kaspersky. I was having
"weirdnesses" and thought something had infected my puter. I always updated
the sig files but it caught nothing. Then I did a little research and tried
Kaspersky and it found a couple of trojans and a virus on the puter.In my
opinion, Norton's is worthless. Oh yeah, a while back a friend and I both
received an .exe "joke" file and Norton's failed to catch it but my
friend's AV software (luckily) did. To me Nav came to a gunfight with Kav
but brought a knife and Kav pistol whipped 'im!Get Kaspersky, you won't
regret it.
Buİk.
>> Stay informed about: Kaspersky vs. Norton Antivirus