Spybot & The Bane of the '!!bad checksum!'

If this has happened once it;s happened 20 times (and on multiple
computers): an attempt is made to update the detection rules for Spybot
Search & Destroy but is unscuccessful due to"!!bad checksum!"

I'm amazed that the creator of this application hasn't fixed this kink
in the couple of years I've been using the program.

Yes SS&D is free BUT its developer asks for donations -- IMHO at the
least he in turn should be providing a program in which major, chronic
issues such as this have been fixed.

This is the ONLY program I use in which checksum errors are a chronic,
recurring problem.

guybannister58.DeleteThis@aol.com wrote:

> If this has happened once it;s happened 20 times (and on multiple
> computers): an attempt is made to update the detection rules for
> Spybot Search & Destroy but is unscuccessful due to"!!bad checksum!"

If it has been asked once, it's been asked 20 times here, and the answer
is always to switch to one of the other mirrors. "Safer Networking #2"
always works.

> I'm amazed that the creator of this application hasn't fixed this
> kink in the couple of years I've been using the program.

It's not the program, it's the mirror.

> Yes SS&D is free BUT its developer asks for donations -- IMHO at the
> least he in turn should be providing a program in which major,
> chronic issues such as this have been fixed.

It's not the program, it's the mirror.

> This is the ONLY program I use in which checksum errors are a
> chronic, recurring problem.

But yes, I agree the people running the mirror service should take the
necessary steps to fix it. Don't blame SS&D, though.

--
-bts
-Warning: I brake for lawn deer