Avast or AVG (or NAV?)

taff wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 20:01:50 -0000, Sam <sam.sam DeleteThis @samsam.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've still got a few months to run with my NAV 2004 subscription but
>> it seems to run very slowly (for example when trying to access its
>> admin functions) and I suspect it drains my already dragging PIII450
>> Win98SE machine. Would AVG free or Avast free be less of a drain
>> on resources and, if so, are they as good as or better than NAV?
>> Also, which is the better package (AVG or Avast)?
>>
>> Your help much appreciated
>
> They are both less resource hungry than NAV, I use AVG but a lot
> recommend Avast, take your pick.
>
> Taff.............
>
>
>
> www.sounds-pa.com | www.thecomputerworkshop.com

I have heard others complain about the same thing
i didn't like norton or Mcafee . AVG let a worm in a couple of years ago
try the avast -it's what I use now
-max
--
'When you have a degree-you don't know everything-just a degree'-Dr
Miles Munroe This message is virus free as far I can tell
Change nomail.afraid.org to hotmail.com so you can reply
(nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for
use in Usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)
 >> Stay informed about: Avast or AVG (or NAV?) 

Those are some of you options But have you thought about NOD32? At least
check
out the free demo and see what you think? read the reports on the software
and
then make a choice. I have Former AVG customers that now use nod because
they
were getting infected so often.


Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful,
committed people can change the world
INDEED, it's the only thing that ever has...)o(....

*******************************************************
This computer is protected by NOD32 Anti Virus System www.nod32.com.au
Be safe on line, have your computer serviced & checked for security.
******************************************************


>
> I've still got a few months to run with my NAV 2004 subscription but it
> seems to run very slowly (for example when trying to access its admin
> functions) and I suspect it drains my already dragging PIII450 Win98SE
> machine. Would AVG free or Avast free be less of a drain on resources
> and, if so, are they as good as or better than NAV? Also, which is the
> better package (AVG or Avast)?
>
> Your help much appreciated
> --
> Sam
 >> Stay informed about: Avast or AVG (or NAV?) 

Faith-Community-Church wrote ...

> I have Former AVG customers that now use nod because
> they
> were getting infected so often.
>
I'll certainly consider NOD32 - thanks.

--
Sam
 >> Stay informed about: Avast or AVG (or NAV?) 

taff wrote ...

> They are both less resource hungry than NAV, I use AVG but a lot
> recommend Avast, take your pick.
>
> Taff.............
>
thanks, Taff
--
Sam
 >> Stay informed about: Avast or AVG (or NAV?) 

Max M.Wachtel III wrote ...

> AVG let a worm in a couple of years ago
> try the avast -it's what I use now
>
thanks.
--
Sam
 >> Stay informed about: Avast or AVG (or NAV?)