AVG 7.5 free vs. BidDefender 8.0 free

I have been testing BidDender V8.0 free.
This is an excerpt from the scanlog vscan.log: a day or so ago:

<snip>
C:\Documents and Settings\H******\Application
Data\Thunderbird\Profiles\mue1z77m.default\Mail\Local
Folders\Inbox=>(message 2278)=>[Subject: Mail Delivery (failure
t******@h*****.][Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 04:40:34 -0600]=>(MIME part)=>(MIME
part)=>(message body) Infected Exploit.Iframe.Vulnerability.B
C:\Documents and Settings\H******\Application
Data\Thunderbird\Profiles\mue1z77m.default\Mail\Local
Folders\Inbox=>(message 2278)=>[Subject: Mail Delivery (failure
t******@h*****.][Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 04:40:34 -0600]=>(MIME part)=>(MIME
part)=>(message body) Disinfection failed
C:\Documents and Settings\H******\Application
Data\Thunderbird\Profiles\mue1z77m.default\Mail\Local
Folders\Inbox=>(message 2278)=>[Subject: Mail Delivery (failure
t******@h*****.][Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 04:40:34 -0600]=>(MIME part)=>(MIME
part)=>(message body) Move failed

<snip>

****************************************

I ran the shell extension test for AVG free 7.5 a few minutes ago, it found
nothing in these same folders. Does it depend on the email scanner alone for
this protection? Why would they not show this?



****************************************


Tommy
MUNGEDtmccMUNGED72AThalDASHpcDOTorg remove everything capitalized to email
my personal webpages w/pc help :
http://www.hal-pc.org/~toner27

Reality is for people who can't handle science fiction.
If Ignorance is Bliss, why aren't more people happy?